step 1. Yet ,, in genealogy and family history, we-all knowthat each laws there’s a different. A vexing section ofgenealogy is that nobody very understands exactly how to utilize this new exceptions orrules having any decisive adjective particularly constantly, perhaps, most likely,probably, an such like. It might be fascinating when the truth be told there most other examples ofjointures getting generated a-year or several after a well-known relationship go out.
dos. Can there be an extant dispensation into wedding off ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes have been third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or fourth cousins, immediately after taken out of the new 5th LordClifford? Who narrow down the wedding date.
Arthur
Allegedly, in the event the a beneficial dispensation are found and offered, it could havebeen by the one of the adopting the, and will come in the latest correspondingregister guide, if it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop out of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop off Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. When your tenth Lord Clifford does wed during the early 1487 [state January] andhas Age later in that seasons, really does new chronology maybe not really works?
John possession?
E produced when you look at the late 1487, Henry born for the 1488/nine, Joan inside the ,etc. filling out new names of your post out of . In the event that (a) thechronology nonetheless really works; and you can (b) their particular relationships section was not reduced; thenwe just have the new 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s that’s in oppositionto the fresh new conjecture that she is a legitimate daughter.
are Los Angeles, CA women really diffrent from american ones?
6. Regarding your 1505 pedigree: Could be the Clifford daughters brand new onlyknown Henry VII affairs omitted? Are there anyone else? Therefore,won’t one to mirror defectively on this document as the a resource?
Off reviews You will find made of the c.1505 Henry VII Relations pedigreeswith this new 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s Northern pedigrees, being
On c.1505 Connections pedigrees, this new Clifford youngsters are maybe not listedin a great Clifford pedigree, but alternatively about St. John pedigree. Since the I’mnot used to brand new St. John loved ones, adopting the ‘s the recommendations asit looks about c.1505 pedigree, once the taken from the fresh new 1834 Coll. Best. etGen. blog post. The fresh new phrasing during the quotations is precisely because seems inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
“No. XII.”From my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess away from Somerset had three husbands.” By “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My Woman the latest King’s Mom.” who’d “The newest King.” whohad “Prince “By “Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest spouse.” she had 3 daus & 2 sons:
Good. “Edith, wedded so you’re able to Geoffrey Rod from Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married to the Lady Margaret, dau. out of theDuke from Clarence.” They had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[another youngster, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He had four pupils:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Five daughters and you will oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to help you Harry Lord Clifford.” They had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, wedded so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. out of Lincolnshire.”B4. “An effective Nun out of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, wedded so you can Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and you will sistren.” With issueindicated, although not titled.C2. “Elizabeth, married so you’re able to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “Age, wedded earliest into the Lord Zouche; after into the LordScrope away from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [from the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated not entitled.
Margaret Duchess away from Somerset, because of the “Lionel Lord Welles, history partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. from K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”